Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
A Pilot Economic Evaluation of a Nature-Based Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Austria.
Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a pilot cost-benefit analysis of a nature-based therapy (NBT) for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Austria. Within the framework of a randomised controlled trial, we identify cost categories, quantify the costs and benefits, and synthesise findings through a partial economic evaluation. Costs were estimated for two scenarios: the trial setting and a hypothetical roll out. Benefits were valued using contingent valuation to estimate willingness to pay (WTP). The trial scenario costs were €326.27 per patient per day, while the roll out scenario estimated was €171.84 per patient per day. Cost component analysis revealed accommodation and staff as the highest contributors in both scenarios. Marginal WTP was estimated at between €25-€35 per day, indicating patients' perceived added value of NBT over standard clinic-based rehabilitation. These exploratory findings suggest NBT could be financially viable if marginal costs are lower than the estimated WTP. This study provides important preliminary evidence on the economic aspects of NBT, highlighting its potential as a sustainable alternative to standard COPD therapy. We recommend that future research expand upon our initial findings and incorporate economic assessments from the early trial design stage to enable more comprehensive cost-benefit analyses, thus facilitating informed decision-making on the implementation of such programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.