ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Blood Flow Restriction Training, Molecular Modulators, and Musculoskeletal Health: A Scoping Review and Translational Perspective.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBlood flow restriction training (BFRT) is a low-load resistance training modality capable of inducing muscle hypertrophy and strength adaptations that are comparable to traditional high-load resistance training. Beyond athletic performance settings, BFRT has growing relevance for musculoskeletal health, rehabilitation and populations unable to tolerate high mechanical loads. However, substantial inter-individual variability in adaptive responses has been reported. Genetic and molecular factors may partly contribute to this variability and inform more individualised exercise strategies. Other intrinsic and extrinsic factors, including age, sex, training status, nutrition, and protocol-related differences, may also influence adaptive responses.
objectiveThis scoping review aimed to map available evidence on molecular modulators of adaptation to BFRT and to identify gaps in the literature regarding genetic influences on BFRT responses.
methodsA structured search of PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar was conducted till 1 February 2026. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies examining BFRT in relation to genetic polymorphisms, gene expression, and molecular signalling pathways associated with strength and hypertrophy outcomes were included. Primary outcomes were genetic and molecular factors relevant to BFRT adaptation, including genetic polymorphisms, gene expression, and molecular signalling markers. Secondary outcomes included muscle strength, hypertrophy, vascular responses, and related functional outcomes where reported. Study selection and data extraction were conducted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The methodological quality of randomised controlled trials was assessed using the PEDro scale. This scoping review was registered retrospectively in the Open Science Framework on 17 March 2026, after completion of the literature search.
resultsFrom an initial 47 records, only three studies (
conclusionsThis scoping review therefore identifies a critical evidence gap, with genotype-informed BFRT prescription remaining unsupported by the current literature. Limited evidence supports the possible role of BFRT in molecular responses associated with muscle adaptation. Future research should prioritise well-designed studies integrating both genetic and molecular analyses to better understand inter-individual variability in BFRT adaptations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.