SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Hybrid Leadership for Māori Health: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This systematic review synthesises the qualitative literature on Māori leadership to examine how leadership is conceptualised, enacted, and constrained, and what this implies for Aotearoa New Zealand's health system. Across included studies, Māori leadership is grounded in whakapapa-based legitimacy, tikanga and mātauranga Māori, and collective responsibility for relational, cultural, and intergenerational wellbeing; these foundations persist across "traditional" and "contemporary" settings, with differences reflecting institutional conditions rather than shifts in core values. Interpreting the literature through a Māori cultural lens, the review shows that leadership is often exercised within Crown-dominated organisations where Māori authority is not the default, requiring leaders to navigate multiple accountabilities to iwi and communities, organisational mandates, and statutory obligations. Hybridity emerges as a structurally produced feature of practice, integrating Māori relational ethics with bureaucratic, professional, and governance requirements and ongoing translation work to make Māori priorities legible within institutional systems. Health-sector evidence illustrates how commissioning, funding, and accountability arrangements can limit Māori decision-making, increase leadership burden, and constrain sustainability and leadership pipelines. The review concludes that strengthening Māori leadership in health requires organisational and system change-such as clearer Māori decision rights, resourced Māori-led priority setting, and accountability mechanisms that operationalise equity and anti-racism-alongside targeted research on governance, commissioning, and system design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.