ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
What Do We Know About Rural Mobile Health Clinics? A Scoping Review.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rural communities face significant healthcare access barriers that contribute to persistent health disparities. Mobile health clinics (MHCs) have emerged as a promising strategy for expanding healthcare access, yet their effectiveness in rural settings remains understudied. The aim of this review was to examine the literature to determine what is known about access, health outcomes, and the cost-effectiveness of rural MHCs, specifically with regard to their impact on patient access and outcomes, return on investment (ROI)/financial, and program sustainability. We conducted a comprehensive search of peer-reviewed and grey literature sources. Systematic screening yielded 34 documents for full analysis. Thematic analysis was conducted across three domains: patient access, patient outcomes, and ROI/sustainability. All 34 documents provided data on patient access, with common themes including expanded service utilization, multi-service integration, overcoming geographic and transportation barriers, and improved healthcare affordability. Thirty-two documents addressed patient outcomes, reporting improvements in preventive care delivery, chronic disease management, and high patient satisfaction. Twenty-eight documents included ROI/sustainability information, with evidence suggesting cost-effectiveness particularly through emergency department visit avoidance and multi-service integration. Across the literature reviewed, the quality of evidence varied considerably, yet we concluded mobile health clinics demonstrate promise for expanding healthcare access and improving outcomes in rural populations. Key success factors include multi-service integration, diverse funding partnerships, technological integration, and strong community engagement. More rigorous research with longitudinal clinical outcome measures and robust economic analyses is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.