ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Measuring General Health Literacy in Haitian Immigrant Adults: Validation of the HLS
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHaitian immigrants in the United States face health literacy challenges related to recent migration, language discordance, and unfamiliar healthcare systems, yet no general health literacy instrument has been psychometrically validated in Haitian Creole. This study translated, culturally adapted, and evaluated the Haitian Creole HLS
methodsHaitian Creole-speaking adults without cancer diagnoses in South Florida (
resultsCognitive interviews supported clarity and cultural appropriateness with minor refinements. Reliability was excellent (ω = 0.949; α = 0.944; AVE = 0.584). The unidimensional model showed good fit (CFI = 0.951; TLI = 0.944; RMSEA = 0.065; SRMR = 0.048), whereas multi-factor models showed limited discriminant validity. Convergent and known-groups validity were supported. Using provisional European-derived cutpoints, 70.2% of participants were classified as having inadequate or problematic health literacy.
conclusionsThe HLS19-Q12-HC showed evidence of reliability and validity as a unidimensional measure of general health literacy and may support research, needs assessment, and culturally responsive interventions for Haitian Creole-speaking populations. Findings should be interpreted in light of the convenience sample from South Florida and the predominantly female composition of the cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.