ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Why Targeting Tumor Acidity Fails: Translational Barriers and Emerging Solutions.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor acidity is a hallmark of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and has been widely regarded as a promising therapeutic target due to its ubiquity, functional relevance, and apparent selectivity for malignant tissues. Extensive preclinical studies have demonstrated that targeting tumor acidity-through inhibition of lactate production, blockade of proton transport, systemic buffering, and pH-responsive drug delivery-can suppress tumor growth, reduce metastasis, and enhance antitumor immunity. However, despite strong mechanistic rationale and consistent preclinical efficacy, these strategies have failed to achieve meaningful and durable clinical success. In this review, we examine the underlying reasons for this translational discrepancy. We highlight key mechanistic and systemic barriers, including spatial heterogeneity of tumor pH, temporal dynamics and adaptive evolution, metabolic plasticity, redundancy of pH-regulating systems, systemic physiological constraints, and drug delivery limitations in hypoxic and acidic regions. We further argue that tumor acidity is not a sufficient standalone driver of tumor progression but rather a feature of a complex and adaptive system shaped by metabolic and microenvironmental interactions. Finally, we discuss emerging strategies that may overcome these limitations, including combination therapies integrating metabolic targeting with immunotherapy, pH-responsive drug delivery systems, microenvironment reprogramming, and biomarker-guided patient stratification. Overall, current evidence suggests that future therapeutic approaches may benefit more from exploiting tumor acidity as a feature of the tumor microenvironment rather than attempting to directly neutralize it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.