ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Growth Factor Signaling in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Conceptual Framework for Chronic Remodeling and Survival.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term survival after solid organ transplantation remains limited by chronic remodeling, fibrosis, vascular complications, and malignancy despite advances in immunosuppressive therapy. Current monitoring strategies primarily rely on functional and immunological parameters that often identify complications only after irreversible injury has occurred. There is a critical need for earlier, mechanistically informative biomarkers that can predict survival outcomes. Many platelet-associated growth factors (PDGF, TGF-β, VEGF, EGF, and IGF-1) are stored in platelet α-granules but can also originate from immune, endothelial, and stromal cells, regulate angiogenesis, extracellular matrix deposition, immune modulation, and tissue repair-processes central to graft adaptation and chronic injury. In this review, we propose the growth factor signaling network as a conceptual framework that potentially links platelet biology, ischemia-reperfusion injury, alloimmune responses, and chronic immunosuppression to sustained growth factor signaling and maladaptive graft remodeling. This framework should be interpreted as a biologically plausible integrative model rather than a fully validated mechanistic pathway in transplant recipients. Importantly, direct clinical evidence linking platelet activation markers (e.g., P-selectin, PF4, β-thromboglobulin) with circulating growth factor levels and long-term transplant outcomes remains limited, highlighting a critical gap in current biomarker research. Emerging clinical evidence suggests their potential prognostic relevance in transplant outcomes. Elevated TGF-β levels have been associated with increased risk of opportunistic infections, while early postoperative IGF-1 concentrations predict short-term survival. Increased VEGF-A levels correlate with primary graft dysfunction and cardiac allograft vasculopathy, while PDGF isoforms contribute to fibrotic and vascular progression across transplanted organs. However, their clinical applicability is limited by methodological variability and lack of large-scale validation. Rather than serving solely as markers of rejection, platelet-associated growth factors may reflect dynamic processes involved in transplant remodeling and mortality risk. Incorporating growth factor profiling into multiparametric survival prediction models may improve early risk stratification and support precision post-transplant management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.