Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42196407›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Ion-Selective Electrodes for Ammonium and Nitrate Determination: Recent Advances, Trends and Perspectives.

Klaudia Morawska, Cecylia Wardak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Klaudia MorawskaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Sciences, University of Maria Curie-Skłodowska, Maria Curie-Sklodowska Sq. 3, 20-031 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-3381-0845
Cecylia WardakDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Sciences, University of Maria Curie-Skłodowska, Maria Curie-Sklodowska Sq. 3, 20-031 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5785-3237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to increasing environmental protection requirements and the rapid advancement of analytical technologies, particular attention is being paid to the development of environmentally friendly, cost-effective, and sensitive measurement tools. One of the key challenges in modern analytics is the effective monitoring of inorganic nitrogen in the natural environment. In this review, we present a variety of ammonium and nitrate ion-selective electrodes. The review includes the years 2020-2026. It was divided into sections based on sensitivity to a given ion, as well as into subsections based on application: monitoring of soil and aquatic environments, the use of sensors for the determination of specific ions in a wide range of samples, and electrode designs that were used only in laboratory studies. A total of 64 nitrate electrodes and 22 ammonium electrodes were analyzed. Comparisons were made based on electrode type, type of internal contact, materials used to enhance ion-to-electron conductivity, and type of ionophore. Additionally, analytical parameters were compiled, including sensitivity, detection limit, linearity range, potential stability, operating pH range, and actual application scenarios. This review allows for an assessment of current trends and may serve as a basis for the design of new potentiometric sensors.

Indexed as

Ammonium CompoundsIon-Selective ElectrodesNitratesEnvironmental MonitoringHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationPotentiometryAmmonium CompoundsNitratesammoniumion-selective electrodesmineral nitrogennitratespotentiometryreview

Identifiers

PMID42196407
PMCPMC13208017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.