ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Colchicine in Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence Structure, Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Translational Positioning Across Cardiovascular Syndromes.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colchicine has emerged as a prominent anti-inflammatory candidate in cardiovascular medicine, supported by a hierarchy of evidence spanning chronic and acute coronary syndromes, post-myocardial infarction care, revascularization, atrial fibrillation, pericardial disease, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, and mechanistic translational models. Across this literature, the most mature study architecture and the strongest clinical support are derived from completed randomized trials in chronic coronary disease and secondary prevention, where colchicine has been shown to prevent major cardiovascular events (MACEs) when added to standard of care. The clearest clinical benefits are the reduction in non-fatal ischemic events in atherosclerotic disease, prevention of recurrent pericarditis and postoperative atrial fibrillation, and attenuation of inflammatory and plaque-related markers. By contrast, mixed or lower-tier evidence renders its application less consistent in acute coronary syndromes, ST-elevation MI (STEMI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related hard outcomes, and heart failure, while a definitive mortality benefit has not been demonstrated. Overall, colchicine is best understood as a targeted clinical adjunct whose value depends heavily on precise indication, timing, dose, gastrointestinal tolerability, and the maturity of the supporting evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.