Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42196200›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

An Apple a Day? The Hypothesis of Cross-Kingdom Gene Regulation by Plant miRNAs in Mammals and Its Controversies.

Rachele Matsagani, Paola Monti, Federica Rota, Eva Dariol, Elia Mario Biganzoli, Valentina Bollati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachele Matsagani'LETE' Laboratory of Environmental and Translational Epigenetics, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-1191
Paola MontiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, "Dipartimento di Eccellenza 2023-2027", University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Federica RotaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, "Dipartimento di Eccellenza 2023-2027", University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9418-4709
Eva Dariol'LETE' Laboratory of Environmental and Translational Epigenetics, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-5675-3389
Elia Mario Biganzoli'LETE' Laboratory of Environmental and Translational Epigenetics, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1202-5873
Valentina Bollati'LETE' Laboratory of Environmental and Translational Epigenetics, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0370-9598

Funding

European Research Council 101086988European Research Council 101212897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. In plants, miRNAs are involved in environmental responses and can be transferred to other species to mediate cross-kingdom regulation of gene expression. This mechanism has recently been proposed in mammals, yet evidence remains scarce and inconsistent. Multiple studies have shown that a fraction of plant-derived miRNAs (pmiRNAs) present in food resist processing, cooking, and digestion. Evidence suggests that dietary-derived pmiRNAs might be absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract and enter circulation, predominantly packaged in extracellular vesicles, and reach different tissues, where they might exert cross-kingdom gene expression regulation. Nonetheless, several attempts to reproduce or confirm the above results have failed, raising questions about the reliability of studies supporting the hypothesis of cross-kingdom gene regulation by pmiRNAs. In this review, we recapitulate the state-of-the-art knowledge in the field, addressing both supporting and opposing evidence, as well as the main analytical challenges that need to be taken into consideration, in an effort to provide a comprehensive framework on the controversial evidence collected so far and support the use of best practices for future research.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGene Expression Regulation, PlantMammalsMicroRNAsPlantsRNA, PlantAnimalsHumansMicroRNAsRNA, Plantcross-kingdom regulationgene expressionmicroRNAplant

Identifiers

PMID42196200
PMCPMC13207338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.