ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
An Apple a Day? The Hypothesis of Cross-Kingdom Gene Regulation by Plant miRNAs in Mammals and Its Controversies.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. In plants, miRNAs are involved in environmental responses and can be transferred to other species to mediate cross-kingdom regulation of gene expression. This mechanism has recently been proposed in mammals, yet evidence remains scarce and inconsistent. Multiple studies have shown that a fraction of plant-derived miRNAs (pmiRNAs) present in food resist processing, cooking, and digestion. Evidence suggests that dietary-derived pmiRNAs might be absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract and enter circulation, predominantly packaged in extracellular vesicles, and reach different tissues, where they might exert cross-kingdom gene expression regulation. Nonetheless, several attempts to reproduce or confirm the above results have failed, raising questions about the reliability of studies supporting the hypothesis of cross-kingdom gene regulation by pmiRNAs. In this review, we recapitulate the state-of-the-art knowledge in the field, addressing both supporting and opposing evidence, as well as the main analytical challenges that need to be taken into consideration, in an effort to provide a comprehensive framework on the controversial evidence collected so far and support the use of best practices for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.