ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparison of the Structure and Properties of Hydroxypropyl Starch/Carrageenan Blends with Different Amylose/Amylopectin Contents.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the structure and properties of hydroxypropyl starch/carrageenan blends with different amylose/amylopectin contents, two types of hydroxypropyl starch-a high-amylose type (amylose content > 70%) and a high-amylopectin type (amylopectin content > 95%)-were used. These starches had similar molecular weights, degrees of hydroxypropyl substitution, and other properties, differing only in their amylose and amylopectin contents. Each starch was blended with carrageenan via a solution blending method, and the resulting blends were systematically characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis, rheological tests, texture analysis, mechanical property tests, contact angle analysis, and UV-Vis spectrophotometry. The results showed that, upon blending with carrageenan, the hydroxypropyl starch transformed from a weak viscoelastic solution into an elastic, strong gel. FTIR and XRD analyses confirmed that the hydroxypropyl starch and carrageenan formed a homogeneous, compact, three-dimensional network via hydrogen bonding. This significantly enhanced the mechanical strength and stability of the blends. The influence of starch molecular structure on the blend system's properties exhibited a pronounced state dependence. In the gel state, hydroxypropyl amylopectin effectively filled the carrageenan network due to its high swelling capacity, thereby improving the thermal stability and textural properties of the blends. However, in the film state, hydroxypropyl amylose with higher crystallinity and denser molecular packing contributed to superior tensile strength, hydrophobicity and light transmittance. Furthermore, the optimal mass ratio of hydroxypropyl starch to carrageenan was found to be in the range of 2:1 to 4:1. With this ratio, excessive cross-linking and poor compatibility could be avoided, resulting in improved mechanical performance, hydrophobicity, and light transmittance. This study reveals the relationship between starch molecular structure, system state and macroscopic properties, providing a theoretical basis for the rational design and regulation of the properties of hydroxypropyl starch/carrageenan blends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.