ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Improved DNA Extraction for Dairy and Blood Products: A Comparative Evaluation of Yield, Purity, and PCR Compatibility.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA must be efficiently extracted from samples to accurately test the authenticity of food, particularly from processed matrices in which DNA integrity may be compromised. We systematically evaluated the efficiency of extracting DNA from dairy and blood products by four methods, namely SDS-CTAB, SDS-isopropanol precipitation, guanidine isothiocyanate magnetic beads, and a commercial kit. The guanidine isothiocyanate-magnetic bead method yields high quantities and purity of DNA; for example, the yield obtained from chicken blood samples was 318.34 ± 4.77 ng/µL, with an A260/A280 ratio ranging from 1.8 to 2.0. The processing time of this method was compared with the DNA Extraction Kit shorter by 40% and unlike methods such as the SDS-CTAB protocol, does not require the use of toxic reagents such as phenol or chloroform, meeting green chemistry requirements. Among the dairy and blood samples tested, it enables the extraction of DNA in quantities comparable to those obtained using commercial kits; moreover, the DNA yield achieved is 20-30% higher than that of these kits. Furthermore, this method is free from the limitations associated with protein contamination and amplification instability often encountered in protocols such as the CTAB-SDS and SDS-isopropanol methods. The magnetic bead approach was adaptable for complex matrices and demonstrated strong tolerance to coexisting contaminants, thereby improving extraction performance in challenging food samples. The magnetic bead surface functionalization and buffer systems could be improved to further increase their versatility. This method enables reliable DNA extraction and advanced technical support for DNA analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.