ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Nutrient-Aware Personalized Meal Recommendation Using Structured Food Knowledge and Constraint Verification.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- D-pFoodReQ: Answer-Frequency-Aware Debiasing for Constrained Knowledge-Base Question Answering in Food Recommendation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Along with the enhancement of people's public health consciousness and the requirement for individual diet arrangement getting more urgent, the meal recommendation method, which is based on artificial intelligence, has hence become an active research domain in the field of intelligent health. One system that makes practical recommendations must deal with the user's unclear queries, while at the same time, it must satisfy strict nutrient demands. A great number of existing methods at present either do not take into account verifiable food composition data, or they handle implicit dietary restrictions in a not good way. For solving these problems, we put forward CARE (Constraint-Aware Recipe Engine). Beginning from a mixed Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) basic model (CARE v1.0), we have developed CARE v2.0, which is a suggestion engine that unites intention polish, knowledge graph enlargement, and rule-based checking in a unified working line. Instead of depending on huge black-box models, our framework utilizes an effective language model that possesses 1.5 B parameters. User inquiry content are undergone parsing to become structured nutrition targets; a food knowledge graph links abstract health notions to specific cooking materials; and the obtained candidate results are filtered in accordance with strict diet restrictions, with optional checking carried out by an automatic agent-based reviewer. Under a zero-shot cold-start situation, the system attains a semantic recall@5 of 0.825 on 400 k recipes coming from Recipe1M+ and a newly created fuzzy-query benchmark (CAREBench-150), and it thus has a better performance than dense retrieval baselines (0.550) as well as direct zero-shot prompting. The constraint satisfaction rate is located at 85.0% in fast mode, and it rises to 98.5% when the verification module is in the working state; therefore, it supports the safety of recommendations. These findings indicate that structured food knowledge, which matches a compact algorithmic framework, can therefore connect unclear user intentions and accurate nutrition requirements effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.