Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42195785›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Carbon Materials Derived from Waste Streams: From Processing Pathways to Structure-Property-Function Relationships.

Sharif H Zein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sharif H ZeinFaculty of Engineering, Sohar University, Sohar 311, Oman.ORCID 0000-0002-8863-1450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accelerating generation of waste streams is observed globally. Spanning lignocellulosic biomass, plastic waste, sewage sludge, and industrial residues, this review presents both an urgent management challenge and a compelling materials opportunity. Carbon materials derived from these waste streams offer a sustainable route to functional carbons applicable in electrochemical energy storage, adsorption, heterogeneous catalysis, and high-temperature applications. Yet their rational design remains constrained by incomplete understanding of the relationships between feedstock composition, processing pathway, structural characteristics, and functional performance. This review provides an integrated analysis of waste-derived carbon materials from processing pathways to structure-property-function relationships. The principal feedstock categories are examined for their compositional characteristics and implications for carbon yield and structure. Five primary processing routes are assessed. The five routes examined are pyrolysis, hydrothermal carbonisation, physical and chemical activation, and microwave-assisted processing. They are assessed comparatively with emphasis on structural outcomes and governing parameters. The resulting structural characteristics are discussed. These are morphology, hierarchical pore architecture, surface chemistry, heteroatom doping, and crystallinity. They are discussed alongside their characterisation methods and known limitations as performance predictors. Structure-property relationships are examined quantitatively. Heteroatom-doped hierarchical porous carbons achieve 612 F/g specific capacitance. Turbostratic hard carbons deliver 450 mAh/g sodium storage with over 90% retention. Hierarchical porous carbons demonstrate CO

Indexed as

electrochemical energy storagehierarchical porous carbonhydrothermal carbonisationpyrolysisstructure–property relationshipswaste-derived carbon materialswaste valorisation policy

Identifiers

PMID42195785
PMCPMC13208407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.