Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42195761›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Fiber Reinforcement Effects on Coal Gangue Concrete: A Review of Mechanical Properties, Durability and Sustainability.

Xia Qin, Sakdirat Kaewunruen, Xiangsheng Liu, Junwu Xia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xia QinState Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
Sakdirat KaewunruenBirmingham Centre for Railway Research and Education, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2153-3538
Xiangsheng LiuSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Darlington 2008, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1680-8376
Junwu XiaState Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0636-721X

Funding

Coal-Major Poject 2025ZD1700601Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/ Y015401/1European Cooperation in Science and Technology CA21103European Cooperation in Science and Technology CA23109Henan Science and Technology Department 251111321900National Natural Science Foundation of China U23A20598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coal gangue, a by-product of coal mining, has attracted increasing attention as an alternative aggregate in concrete because it can reduce natural aggregate consumption and promote solid-waste utilization. However, its porous, heterogeneous, and source-dependent nature often leads to weak interfacial bonding, reduced strength, and poor durability. Fiber reinforcement has been widely investigated as an effective strategy to compensate for these deficiencies, but the reported results remain scattered because of differences in gangue source, replacement level, fiber type and dosage, and test methods. This review systematically synthesizes the effects of fiber reinforcement on the mechanical performance, durability, and sustainability of coal gangue concrete. Reported results are comparatively analyzed as functions of coal gangue replacement level and fiber dosage. Two strength-normalized sustainability indicators, namely the Cost Coefficient Index (CCI) and Carbon Emission Index (CEI), are further introduced to compare the economic and environmental efficiency of different mixtures. Relatively favorable overall performance was most frequently reported within the commonly reported coal gangue replacement range for coarse aggregates, about 35-70%, with steel fiber and basalt fiber commonly showing favorable intervals of about 0.8-1.0% and 0.12-0.15%, respectively; polypropylene fiber also appeared favorable at about 0.6-1.0%, although the supporting evidence is comparatively less extensive.

Indexed as

CGdurabilityfiber-reinforced concretemechanical propertiessustainability

Identifiers

PMID42195761
PMCPMC13208543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.