ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Fiber Reinforcement Effects on Coal Gangue Concrete: A Review of Mechanical Properties, Durability and Sustainability.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coal gangue, a by-product of coal mining, has attracted increasing attention as an alternative aggregate in concrete because it can reduce natural aggregate consumption and promote solid-waste utilization. However, its porous, heterogeneous, and source-dependent nature often leads to weak interfacial bonding, reduced strength, and poor durability. Fiber reinforcement has been widely investigated as an effective strategy to compensate for these deficiencies, but the reported results remain scattered because of differences in gangue source, replacement level, fiber type and dosage, and test methods. This review systematically synthesizes the effects of fiber reinforcement on the mechanical performance, durability, and sustainability of coal gangue concrete. Reported results are comparatively analyzed as functions of coal gangue replacement level and fiber dosage. Two strength-normalized sustainability indicators, namely the Cost Coefficient Index (CCI) and Carbon Emission Index (CEI), are further introduced to compare the economic and environmental efficiency of different mixtures. Relatively favorable overall performance was most frequently reported within the commonly reported coal gangue replacement range for coarse aggregates, about 35-70%, with steel fiber and basalt fiber commonly showing favorable intervals of about 0.8-1.0% and 0.12-0.15%, respectively; polypropylene fiber also appeared favorable at about 0.6-1.0%, although the supporting evidence is comparatively less extensive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.