ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
3D-Printed PLA/HA Composite Scaffolds: Balancing Mechanical Properties for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced osteogenic potential of chitosan scaffolds loaded withRegenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Identification of an Optimal Gyroid Microarchitecture of 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitutes for Vertical Bone Augmentation and Osteoconduction.Biomolecules · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone tissue engineering requires biomimetic materials; however, pure polylactic acid (PLA) exhibits limited osteoinductivity and produces acidic byproducts upon degradation. To address these limitations, this study fabricated PLA scaffolds using fused-deposition modeling (FDM) with four distinct lattice structures (rectangular, triangular, gyroid, and 3D honeycomb) and incorporated hydroxyapatite (HA) at 0, 10, 20, and 30 wt% via injection molding. Mechanical properties were evaluated via compression, three-point bending, and tensile testing. The results revealed that increasing HA content significantly reduced structural strength and increased brittleness across all test modes. Specifically, specimens with 30 wt% HA exhibited a 70.8% reduction in bending strength relative to pure PLA (from 58.60 MPa to 17.07 MPa), while tensile strength decreased by 46.1% at just 10 wt% HA (from 37.54 MPa to 20.23 MPa). Although the triangular lattice achieved the highest absolute compressive load, the rectangular lattice provided a superior load-to-weight ratio and greater plastic deformation capacity before fracture. Consequently, these findings indicate that the rectangular pattern at 70% infill density combined with HA addition limited to ≤10 wt% represents the most mechanically balanced design for bone defect repair applications. Based on the mechanical characterization performed in this study, and drawing on published evidence regarding the biological properties of PLA/HA composites, these scaffolds represent a mechanically promising candidate for further evaluation in bone tissue regeneration. Biological validation through in vitro and in vivo studies is required before clinical relevance can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.