Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42195711›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Advances in Metal Microstructure Simulation and Analysis.

Meng Liu, Hongrui Zhou, Hui Jiang, Caixu Yue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meng LiuSchool of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Xue Fu Street, Harbin 150080, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3498-7678
Hongrui ZhouThe College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Qiqihar University, Wen Hua Street, Qiqihar 161000, China.
Hui JiangQiqihar Heavy CNC Equipment Co., Xin Cheng Street, Qiqihar 161005, China.
Caixu YueSchool of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Xue Fu Street, Harbin 150080, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerical simulation of metal microstructure evolution is essential for material design and performance optimization. This paper reviews major simulation methods for key evolution mechanisms, including recrystallization, grain growth, slip, twinning, and phase transformation. The reviewed methods are classified into atomistic models, discrete-field models, and continuous-field models. Molecular dynamics (MD) is discussed as an independent atomistic approach, with emphasis on its role in revealing atomic-scale mechanisms, calibrating mesoscale parameters, and bridging atomistic, mesoscale, and continuum simulations. Discrete-field methods, including Monte Carlo, cellular automata, and vertex models, are compared with continuous-field methods, including artificial neural networks, phase field models, finite element methods, and level-set methods. Furthermore, a semi-quantitative evaluation matrix based on accuracy, computational cost, scalability, and applicability is established to clarify the practical trade-offs among different methods. The results show that no single method is universally optimal; instead, method selection should depend on the dominant physical mechanism, target length scale, required accuracy, and available computational resources. This review provides methodological guidance for multiscale microstructure simulation and supports future applications in precision machining, additive manufacturing, and process parameter optimization.

Indexed as

changes in metal microstructurecontinuous field modeldiscrete field modelmicrostructure

Identifiers

PMID42195711
PMCPMC13208799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.