ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Swelling Mechanism of Rubber Sealing Materials in Methanol Transportation Pipelines.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing demand for long-distance green methanol transportation highlights the critical need to evaluate the safety and reliability of pipeline sealing materials. This study investigates the swelling mechanisms of fluorocarbon rubber (FKM), nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) under simulated methanol pipeline conditions. Static immersion tests were conducted under simulated pipeline conditions with water contents of 0-20% and temperatures of 25-55 °C, supplemented by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). FKM exhibited severe physical swelling, with the volume increase reaching up to 80% in pure methanol. Notably, the addition of 5% water markedly suppressed this swelling, reducing the volume change of FKM sealing rings to approximately 3% and the mass change to 1%. Conversely, NBR experienced volume shrinkage and mass loss due to the extraction of the plasticizer Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate by methanol, a process also inhibited by water. PTFE demonstrated exceptional chemical stability and negligible dimensional changes owing to its high crystallinity and rigid structure. Consequently, PTFE is recommended as the optimal sealing material for pure methanol pipelines. When utilizing FKM or NBR, strict control over the fluid's water content and operating temperature is essential to prevent degradation and ensure long-term pipeline integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.