ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Acoustic Source Localisation of Crack Initiation During Laser-Based DED: Experimental Validation and Challenges.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the feasibility of airborne acoustic source localisation (ASL) for in situ crack localisation in industrial laser-based directed energy deposition (DED-LB/M) fabricated structures. A four-microphone array combined with a Generalised Cross-Correlation with Phase Transform (GCC-PHAT) algorithm was used to estimate crack positions from time differences of arrival (TDOAs) extracted from raw acoustic emissions during multi-layer single-track fabrication. Prior to experimentation, the microphone array geometry was numerically optimised under industrial placement constraints by introducing controlled TDOA perturbations and minimising three-dimensional localisation uncertainty using alpha-shape volume analysis. Experimental validation was performed on six-layer single-track structures, with estimated crack positions compared against post-process microscopic measurements. Localisation errors ranged from 12 to 68 mm in the X-direction, 0.7-32 mm in the Y-direction, and 5-100 mm in the Z-direction. While horizontal localisation demonstrated centimetre-scale accuracy for most cracks, depth estimation exhibited greater variability. The results confirm that airborne ASL can provide meaningful spatial information regarding crack formation during DED-LB/M. However, localisation performance remains sensitive to TDOA estimation accuracy, microphone array constraints, and the complex acoustic environment inherent to the process. This work demonstrates the industrial feasibility of ASL for in situ crack investigation while highlighting the need for further advancements in array design and signal processing to achieve robust three-dimensional defect localisation in additive manufacturing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.