ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Recycled Polypropylene Composites Reinforced with Microcellulose Fibres and Microcellulose-Derived Biochar: Thermal, Rheological and Mechanical Performance.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanical recycling of mono-material biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) packaging films produces recycled polypropylene (rPP) with degraded properties, limiting its use in higher-performance applications. This study investigates rPP reinforcement with 6-12 µm microcellulose fibres (MCFs, 2-10 pbw) and microcellulose-derived biochar (BC, 5-20 pbw), characterized by DSC, TGA/DTG, MVR/MFR, temperature-dependent rheology, mechanical testing and water contact angle (WCA) measurements. Both fillers acted as heterogeneous nucleating agents, shifting crystallization by up to 4 °C and increasing crystallinity by 2-4%. MCF introduced an additional low-temperature degradation step, whereas BC increased onset and peak degradation temperatures by up to 20 °C and increased char yield. Low MCF loadings increased MVR/MFR by 20-25% and reduced melt viscosity, while BC decreased flow indices by up to 50% and stiffened the melt. Tensile and flexural moduli increased by 15-25% with MCF and 40-50% with BC, with a stiffness-toughness trade-off at the highest BC contents. MCF reduced the water contact angle to 63.0° at 10 pbw, while BC increased it to 108.1° at 20 pbw, indicating opposite effects on surface wettability. Converting a single cellulosic feedstock into fibrous or carbonised fillers enables bio-based upgrading of rPP, in line with circular economy principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.