Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42195568›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Prediction of Bond Strength in Corroded Reinforced Concrete Using SVM and XGB Methods.

Zhi-Qiang Chen, Zhuang Chen, Ying-Zi Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhi-Qiang ChenSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Zhuang ChenSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Ying-Zi ZhongSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6587-4882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bond strength of corroded reinforced concrete (CRC) structures is critical for structural safety and long-term durability. However, the corrosion-induced bond degradation process is influenced by multiple, coupled factors and exhibits complex, nonlinear behavior, making it difficult for traditional theoretical models to provide accurate predictions. To address this challenge, this study proposes a novel, unified prediction framework based on machine learning techniques. A total of 391 experimental datasets were collected and compiled, covering key parameters including bond strength, reinforcing bar diameter, yield strength, concrete cover thickness, concrete compressive strength, mass loss rate due to corrosion, and the presence of stirrups. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms were employed to develop predictive models for bond strength. Model training and testing were performed using 10-fold cross-validation. Furthermore, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was introduced to enhance model interpretability and quantitatively assess the influence of each input feature, revealing that mass loss rate and bar diameter are the dominant factors. This study effectively bridges the research gap between high-precision black-box algorithms and the need for physical interpretability in engineering. The results demonstrate that (1) the proposed XGBoost model significantly outperforms traditional empirical formulations, achieving a high coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

bond strengthcorroded reinforced concreteextreme gradient boostingSHAP methodsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID42195568
PMCPMC13208491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.