Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42195525›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2026

Toward the Advancement of Soft Pneumatic Rotary Actuators: A Comprehensive Design Review.

Ehsan Kiani Harchegani, Joško Valentinčič

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ehsan Kiani HarcheganiFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 6, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-2462-1923
Joško ValentinčičFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 6, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-4911-1196

Funding

CELSA DFun3DThe Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P2-0248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of robotic systems that can operate safely and adaptively alongside humans requires actuators that combine compliance with reliable performance. Soft pneumatic rotary actuators (SPRAs) have emerged as promising candidates due to their inherent compliance, lightweight design, and capability to generate smooth rotational motion through elastic deformation. However, the diverse designs and performance characteristics of SPRAs make it challenging to identify optimal configurations for specific applications. This review comprehensively surveys current SPRAs, focusing on structural designs, materials, and fabrication methods. While SPRAs offer advantages such as reduced risk of injury and enhanced adaptability, significant challenges remain in optimizing torque output, rotational range, and durability. By comparing existing designs and highlighting open research challenges, this paper aims to guide the advancement of SPRAs, facilitating their integration into safe, effective robotic systems for industrial, medical, and wearable applications.

Indexed as

actuator designpneumatic soft actuationsoft pneumatic rotary actuatorssoft robotics

Identifiers

PMID42195525
PMCPMC13209276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.