Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42195509›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2026

Comparative Evaluation of Optical Alignment Algorithms for Integrated Probe Cards in Photonic Wafer Testing.

Mehdi Bejani, Alessia Galli, Riccardo Vettori, Marco Mauri, Stefano Mariani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehdi BejaniDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7668-3413
Alessia GalliTechnoprobe, 23870 Cernusco Lombardone, Italy.
Riccardo VettoriTechnoprobe, 23870 Cernusco Lombardone, Italy.
Marco MauriTechnoprobe, 23870 Cernusco Lombardone, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-0553-4348
Stefano MarianiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5111-9800

Funding

European Union 101072491).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wafer-level testing of Photonic Integrated Circuits (PICs) represents a critical throughput bottleneck in silicon photonics manufacturing, particularly as co-packaged optics demand testing of thousands of optical I/O per wafer. This work introduces optimized alignment algorithms for the Technoprobe Eclipse Dynamic probe card system, which integrates electrical probes and a piezoelectrically actuated fiber array unit within a single probe head, eliminating external positioning equipment. We systematically evaluate seven alignment algorithms: Reference Coarse Scan, Reference Coarse+Fine Scan, Cross Scan, Local and Global Bayesian Optimization, Variable and Fixed Gradient Ascent. The evaluation is made across 72 simulated test cases derived from eight experimental datasets through systematic spatial windowing, combined with experimental validation. Performance is assessed under four operating regimes-high-speed (HS) and low-speed (LS) operation, each with or without hysteresis compensation (H/NH). Experimental validation across eight die positions confirms 100% success rate for both Local Bayesian (98.24% accuracy in 99.87 arbitrary units (a.u.)) and Fixed Gradient (99.18% accuracy in 154.01 a.u.) baseline algorithms. Comprehensive simulation results with improved algorithms across all four scenarios reveal distinct performance characteristics. Fixed Gradient achieves the highest reliability (95.8%) with 99.4% average accuracy across all operating conditions. Variable Gradient provides the fastest alignment (1.18 a.u. in HS-NH) with 90.3% reliability. Local Bayesian demonstrates 94.4% reliability with intermediate performance. Global Bayesian Optimization achieves the best sample efficiency (average 24 steps) but exhibits scenario-dependent reliability ranging from 88.9% (HS-H, LS-H) to 93.1% (LS-NH). For the ideal production scenario, high speed with effective hysteresis compensation (HS-NH), Fixed Gradient emerges as the optimal choice, delivering 95.8% reliability with 1.44 a.u. alignment time, resulting in the best success rate while being nearly as fast as the fastest method. Variable Gradient achieves the absolute fastest alignment (1.18 a.u.) but with 5.5% lower reliability (90.3%), making it suitable only for applications tolerating higher failure rates. Under realistic production conditions with uncompensated hysteresis (HS-H), Fixed Gradient maintains its advantage (95.8% reliability, 3.32 a.u.), while Global Bayesian degrades significantly (88.9% reliability, 4.29 a.u.). Statistical analysis using data profiles validates these methods for high-volume PIC manufacturing, with the Eclipse Dynamic system demonstrating per-die optical alignments in sub-second timescales using open-loop control hardware.

Indexed as

Bayesian optimizationhysteresis compensationoptical alignmentPhotonic Integrated Circuitspiezoelectric actuationprobe cardwafer-level testing

Identifiers

PMID42195509
PMCPMC13209347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.