ArticleMicromachines2026
Flexible High-Frequency Underwater Transducer Based on Piezoelectric Composites.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a flexible, lightweight high-frequency underwater transducer (FT) was designed and fabricated. To ensure the flexibility and reliability of the transducer, a flexible piezoelectric composite material with a same-side electrode configuration and a perforated flexible printed circuit (FPC) were designed. First, finite element simulation analysis was performed on the flexible piezoelectric composites to optimize the structural parameters. Next, using a cutting and infusion method combined with reflow soldering, the piezoelectric composites and FPC were integrated to form a flexible sensing element. Finally, a flexible packaging process for the underwater transducer was investigated, resulting in a flexible underwater transducer with a thickness of only 5.3 mm. The results of underwater electroacoustic comparison tests show that the transmission and reception performance of the FT differs by less than 0.5 dB from that of conventional rigid transducers. This demonstrates that the flexible underwater transducer developed in this study not only possesses the advantages of flexibility and can be conformally mounted on curved surfaces but also achieves acoustic performance comparable to that of traditional rigid transducers, thereby providing new insights for the lightweight development of underwater transducers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.