ArticleMicromachines2026
Additively Manufactured Density-Graded Dual-Material Auxetic Structures: Enhanced Energy Absorption and Shape Recovery.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The auxetic reentrant structure, one of the most widely studied negative Poisson's ratio structures for its geometric simplicity, has long seen limited applications due to challenges emanating from its inherent design when built from a single rigid or flexible material. This paper aims to address these challenges by taking advantage of dual-material extrusion technology and density gradient design strategy. Two density gradient reentrant auxetic structures are proposed and fabricated using material extrusion additive manufacturing in single-material (flexible) and dual-material (rigid/flexible) modes, with the introduction of a novel dual-material interface design. In-plane compression tests are carried out to assess the energy absorption characteristics of the structures. The results show that dual-material structures exhibit higher yield stress, mean crushing force, peak crushing force, and maximum crushing force, as well as superior specific energy, energy dissipation, and energy release compared to single-material structures. Dual-material structures also demonstrate high lateral stiffness, minimizing elastic instability, a highly desirable feature for reusable energy-absorbing structures with high shape recovery capability. The results substantiate the significance of the synergy between the dual-material and density gradient designs proposed in this study. Overall, the key findings of the study may serve as a reliable reference for the design of future lightweight energy-absorbing structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.