ArticleMicromachines2026
Evaluation of 3D-Printed Dry Electrodes for Surface Electromyography in Dynamic Muscle Assessment.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surface electromyography (sEMG) is widely used to assess muscle activity in clinical and research settings. However, while conventional wet electrodes have advanced considerably in recent years, they are often limited by disposability, reduced comfort, and limited reusability. Recent advances in additive manufacturing provide opportunities to fabricate customizable, low-cost dry electrodes using conductive filaments. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and signal performance of in-house-fabricated 3D-printed sEMG electrodes made from three commercially available conductive filaments, (Fili, Filaflex, and Proto-Pasta) differing in base polymer and resistivity, and compared their performance with standard wet electrodes. Surface electrodes were placed over the biceps brachii muscle, and EMG signals were recorded during concentric-eccentric elbow flexion under three loading conditions (3, 5, and 7 kg). Signal quality was assessed using EMG amplitude, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and background noise. The results showed no significant differences in SNR or background noise between the 3D-printed electrodes and standard wet electrodes. Among the tested materials, Proto-Pasta electrodes produced the highest mean EMG amplitudes, while Filaflex electrodes showed slightly lower background noise, although these differences were not statistically significant. Overall, the findings indicate that in-house-fabricated 3D-printed electrodes can provide signal quality comparable to conventional wet electrodes, supporting their potential use as low-cost and customizable alternatives for sEMG applications in research and wearable monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.