ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Diagnostic Challenges and Treatment Strategies in Neutrophilic Cicatricial Alopecias: A Narrative Review from Conventional Therapies to New Therapeutic Targets.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Folliculitis decalvans (FD) and dissecting cellulitis of the scalp (DCS) are neutrophilic primary cicatricial alopecias characterized by chronic inflammation and irreversible hair loss, with distinct pathogenic mechanisms that make accurate diagnosis essential for appropriate management. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of systemic therapeutic options for FD and DCS, to evaluate their efficacy in relation to underlying disease mechanisms, and to explore emerging targeted treatments. A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE using relevant keywords related to neutrophilic cicatricial alopecias and therapeutic strategies, including studies reporting clinical outcomes in FD and DCS. Available evidence indicates that conventional therapies remain the cornerstone of management: antibiotics are typically first-line in FD, while isotretinoin represents the mainstay of treatment in DCS and a key option in refractory FD; however, these approaches are often associated with partial responses and frequent relapses. Biologic agents, particularly TNF-α inhibitors, have shown consistent benefit in refractory cases, while IL-17/23 and JAK inhibitors are supported by limited but emerging data. Overall, treatment response appears to reflect underlying pathogenic differences between FD and DCS, underscoring the importance of a tailored, mechanism-based approach. Further studies are needed to establish standardized treatment algorithms and confirm long-term efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.