Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42195364›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Approaches to Intraepithelial Cervical Neoplasia Management in Pregnancy: A Narrative Review.

Delia-Maria Bogheanu, Awatif Jaafar Sadeq Al Bayati, Mircea-Octavian Poenaru, Octavian Gabriel Olaru, Gabriel-Petre Gorecki, Andreea Gratiana Boiangiu, Bashar Haj Hamoud, Romina-Marina Sima, Liana Ples

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Delia-Maria BogheanuDepartment PhD, IOSUD, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Awatif Jaafar Sadeq Al BayatiDepartment PhD, IOSUD, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Mircea-Octavian PoenaruDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0007-1999-1915
Octavian Gabriel OlaruDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Gabriel-Petre GoreckiFaculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 040441 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5340-8929
Andreea Gratiana BoiangiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Bashar Haj HamoudDepartment for Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Romina-Marina SimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9541-3347
Liana PlesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review examines current evidence on the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) during pregnancy, a clinical scenario requiring a balance between maternal oncologic safety and fetal well-being. A qualitative synthesis was conducted using major databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect), focusing on studies published between 2019 and 2025, supplemented by key earlier publications. A total of 37 studies and international guidelines were included. Available evidence suggests that pregnancy does not substantially alter the natural history of human papillomavirus infection. Although CIN is generally associated with low progression rates and notable postpartum regression, findings remain heterogeneous and largely based on retrospective data. Colposcopy is essential for excluding invasive disease, while invasive procedures are reserved for suspected malignancy. Most guidelines support conservative management with surveillance during pregnancy and postpartum reassessment. HPV testing offers higher sensitivity, whereas cytology remains widely used due to its specificity. The impact of delivery mode remains inconclusive. Overall, current recommendations rely on limited evidence and should be interpreted with caution. Further prospective studies are needed to refine pregnancy-specific management strategies.

Indexed as

cervical dysplasiacervical screening in pregnancycolposcopy during pregnancyconservative managementpostpartum regression

Identifiers

PMID42195364
PMCPMC13208676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.