ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Approaches to Intraepithelial Cervical Neoplasia Management in Pregnancy: A Narrative Review.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review examines current evidence on the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) during pregnancy, a clinical scenario requiring a balance between maternal oncologic safety and fetal well-being. A qualitative synthesis was conducted using major databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect), focusing on studies published between 2019 and 2025, supplemented by key earlier publications. A total of 37 studies and international guidelines were included. Available evidence suggests that pregnancy does not substantially alter the natural history of human papillomavirus infection. Although CIN is generally associated with low progression rates and notable postpartum regression, findings remain heterogeneous and largely based on retrospective data. Colposcopy is essential for excluding invasive disease, while invasive procedures are reserved for suspected malignancy. Most guidelines support conservative management with surveillance during pregnancy and postpartum reassessment. HPV testing offers higher sensitivity, whereas cytology remains widely used due to its specificity. The impact of delivery mode remains inconclusive. Overall, current recommendations rely on limited evidence and should be interpreted with caution. Further prospective studies are needed to refine pregnancy-specific management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.