ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Proposal for an Expanded Classification of the Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System (SMAS) in the Human Forehead, Based on Anatomical and Microscopic Study.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) is fundamental for facial soft tissue support and surgical rejuvenation. Although its morphology in the midface and neck is well characterized, the structure of its cranial extension to the forehead remains a subject of terminological uncertainty. The aim of this study was to conduct a detailed histological and immunohistochemical examination of the forehead supporting structures to characterize their morphology and propose an expanded, region-specific classification of the SMAS. MATERIAL AND
methodsFull-thickness tissue specimens (n = 30) were obtained from five standardized facial regions (parotid, buccal, temporal, frontal, and cervical) from 12 male and 18 female body donors (aged 25-70 years). Specimens were processed for histological analysis using hematoxylin and eosin, van Gieson staining, and Masson's trichrome. Immunohistochemical staining for S100 protein was used to identify neural structures. Morphometric analysis was performed on digitized sections to quantify interseptal distances and the depth of superficial nerve trunks.
resultsThe analysis confirmed the established SMAS types (I-V) in the cheek, parotid gland, and neck, confirming the validity of the method. Two distinct, sequentially arranged structures were identified on the forehead, proposed as new types. Type VI (neurovascular arborization) is a discrete fan-shaped structures with a central collagen core surrounding a neurovascular bundle, showing positive S100 staining. These structures, spaced approximately 2.2 mm apart, function as true retaining ligaments. Type VII (fibroseptal) SMAS patterns is vertically oriented, purely fibrous septa (retinacula cutis) connecting the aponeurosis to the dermis, devoid of neural elements, and spaced approximately 9.2 mm apart. Importantly, the superficial nerve trunks were located at an average depth of only 1.09 mm (range: 0.57-1.97 mm) from the skin surface.
conclusionThis study identified two novel SMAS patterns in the forehead-neurovascular arborization (type VI) and fibroseptal (type VII)-supporting the expanded functional seven-type classification of the SMAS. The extremely superficial location of the forehead nerves (average 1.1 mm) defines a critical "danger zone" for aesthetic procedures. These findings provide a refined anatomical basis for improving the precision and safety of both surgical and minimally invasive facial procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.