ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Left Atrioventricular Coupling Index: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional cardiovascular assessment has historically focused on the isolated evaluation of either atrial or ventricular structure and function. However, the left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) represents a paradigm shift by moving beyond single-chamber metrics to quantify the dynamic interaction between the left atrium and left ventricle. Defined as the ratio of left atrial end-diastolic volume to left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LACI integrates structural and functional aspects of cardiac performance. This comprehensive review examines the physiological basis of how the left atrium and ventricle operate as an integrated hemodynamic unit. We detail current measurement methodologies, including two- and three-dimensional echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, which serves as the reference standard. Furthermore, the review explores the pathophysiological mechanisms driving atrioventricular uncoupling, specifically mechanical dysfunction, electromechanical desynchrony, and hemodynamic alterations. Extensive clinical evidence demonstrates LACI's robust independent prognostic value across diverse cardiovascular conditions, such as heart failure, myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathies, and atrial fibrillation. Observational data suggest that LACI provides a promising prognostic value beyond established risk assessment tools by combining the assessment of both chambers' interdependence. Finally, we outline future directions for clinical translation, highlighting the necessity for standardized measurement protocols, the integration of artificial intelligence, and the potential of LACI as a target for personalized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.