ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP): Are We There Yet?
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) affects preterm infants worldwide, involving abnormal development of retinal blood vessels associated with supplemental oxygen use in neonatal care. Although there have been strides in identifying at-risk infants, implementing early screening, updating disease criteria through the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ICROP), and developing new therapies, ROP remains a leading cause of preventable blindness. As preterm birth survival rates rise, the incidence of ROP continues to increase and is projected to rise even in countries with abundant resources and well-established care programs. Improving ROP care requires global standardization of screening, diagnosis, and management to prevent missed diagnoses and minimize outcome variability. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections are changing the landscape of ROP management, but longitudinal research is needed to determine their long-term safety in preterm infants. Effective ROP management relies on teamwork across disciplines and open communication with parents. Given that parents are lifelong caregivers of a child who may be affected by ROP-related vision impairment, including them in the care team and encouraging psychosocial support is vital. Socioeconomic disparities and limited access to ROP-trained ophthalmologists exacerbate disease burden, underscoring the need for innovative solutions to improve access to care. This perspective emphasizes the importance of globally standardizing ROP prevention and care, noting that efforts are still incomplete, equitable access has not been realized, and the long-term role of anti-VEGF agents in ROP treatment remains unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.