ArticleGenes2026
Unsupervised Reference Modeling of Nanopore Signals for DNA/RNA Modification Detection.
Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNanopore sequencing produces ionic current signals that are sensitive to chemical modifications in DNA and RNA molecules. However, accurate modification detection remains challenging due to limited labeled data and variability across experimental conditions.
methodsWe present a scalable unsupervised framework for modification discovery that learns reference signal distributions from unmodified sequences using a CNN-Transformer variational autoencoder (VAE). The model is trained on large-scale data via streaming sampling and k-mer-aware soft balancing to ensure robust signal representation. At inference, candidate nucleotides are scored using the VAE reconstruction error, and read-level signals are aggregated to produce site-level modification evidence.
resultsOn controlled DNA oligonucleotide datasets, models trained on unmodified sequences achieve strong discrimination when evaluated on modified oligos. In contrast, performance decreases in cell line samples when models trained on unmodified whole-genome-amplified (WGA) DNA and in vitro-transcribed (IVT) RNA are evaluated on natively modified (5mC/m6A) data, reflecting the impacts of biological noise and heterogeneity. Despite reduced classification accuracy, site-level anomaly score profiles exhibit peak-like patterns that correspond to known modification-enriched regions.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale unsupervised reference modeling for de novo modification detection, while underscoring the challenges in translating models built from synthetic oligo datasets into robust genome-wide modification detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.