ArticleGenes2026
Distinct Associations of
Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare neoplasms of the anterior mediastinum, ranging from indolent thymomas to aggressive thymic carcinomas. Increasing evidence suggests that genetic alterations contribute to their pathogenesis and biological behavior.
methodsIn this study, 150 TET samples from Vietnamese patients were classified according to WHO guidelines and the Masaoka-Koga staging system. Genotyping was conducted on 139 high-quality samples using Sanger sequencing targeting exon 15 of
resultsOur study identified a total of 17 variants across
conclusionThese hypothesis-generating findings suggest that variations in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.