ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Loneliness in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multidimensional Determinant of Clinical Outcomes and Disease Management.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) imposes a substantial physical and psychosocial burden, yet the role of loneliness remains under-recognised in clinical practice. Loneliness, defined as a subjective discrepancy between desired and actual social relationships, has emerged as a clinically relevant determinant of patient outcomes. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on the epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical consequences of loneliness in COPD, and evaluates its implications for disease management. Available evidence indicates that loneliness affects a considerable proportion of individuals with COPD, with prevalence estimates ranging from approximately 18% to over 30%, particularly among patients with greater symptom burden, functional limitation, and oxygen dependence. Dyspnoea and advancing disease severity reduce social participation and increase vulnerability to perceived social disconnection. Loneliness influences COPD outcomes through interconnected behavioural, biological, and healthcare engagement pathways, including systemic inflammation, neuroendocrine stress responses, physical inactivity, impaired self-management, and reduced engagement with healthcare services. These mechanisms contribute to poorer clinical trajectories, as loneliness is consistently associated with reduced health-related quality of life, increased exacerbations, higher healthcare utilisation, greater risk of hospitalisation, and elevated mortality, independent of depression and anxiety. Despite this, loneliness is rarely assessed in routine respiratory care, and targeted interventions remain limited. Emerging strategies, including pulmonary rehabilitation, peer support, and digital health interventions, show promise in reducing loneliness and improving outcomes. Loneliness represents a modifiable and clinically actionable risk factor in COPD, and its integration into routine assessment and management may enhance patient engagement, optimise treatment effectiveness, and reduce healthcare burden. Addressing loneliness represents a critical opportunity to advance more effective and comprehensive COPD care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.