ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Iron Deficiency and Oral Treatments: Limitations, Pharmacokinetics, and the Role of Iron Protein Succinylate in Clinical Practice.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on García-Erce et al. Iron Deficiency and Oral Treatments: Limitations, Pharmacokinetics, and the Role of Iron Protein Succinylate in Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Iron deficiency (ID) is the most prevalent nutritional disorder worldwide, affecting diverse populations including children, women of reproductive age, older adults and patients with chronic conditions. Oral iron supplementation remains the cornerstone of treatment, together with management of the underlying causes. However, conventional ferrous and ferric salts are often associated with gastrointestinal side effects, poor adherence and limited efficacy, especially in inflammatory settings due to hepcidin-mediated absorption blockade. This review summarizes iron absorption physiology, limitations of traditional oral therapies, and the potential benefits of iron protein succinylate (IPS), a ferric complex bound to succinylated casein. IPS provides pH-dependent release and contains succinic acid, which may enhance absorption while reducing gastrointestinal adverse events. Clinical studies indicate that IPS achieves hematologic outcomes comparable or superior to standard oral salts, fewer gastrointestinal effects and better tolerability. These properties make IPS suitable for patients who do not tolerate or respond adequately to conventional therapy. Special attention is given to chronic inflammation, pregnancy, cancer, or gastrointestinal disorders, where oral iron often fails due to impaired absorption or poorer tolerance. Practical recommendations are included to optimize supplementation through dosing strategies and tailored approaches. Overall, IPS offers an effective, better-tolerated alternative to conventional oral iron therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.