Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42194532›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Regional Anaesthesia Approaches in Head and Neck Surgery: Current Evidence and Clinical Applications.

Antonino Maniaci, Mario Lentini, Maria Stella Di Modica, Federica Maria Parisi, Carlos Chiesa-Estomba, Jerome Rene Lechien, Giuseppe A G Lombardo, Matthew White, Luigi La Via

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Antonino ManiaciDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1251-0185
Mario LentiniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-8127-5045
Maria Stella Di ModicaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", 94100 Enna, Italy.
Federica Maria ParisiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", 94100 Enna, Italy.
Carlos Chiesa-EstombaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Donostia, 20001 San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9454-9464
Jerome Rene LechienDepartment of Surgery, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, 7000 Mons, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0845-0845
Giuseppe A G LombardoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3704-9265
Matthew WhiteDivision of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Capetown 6665, South Africa.
Luigi La ViaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", 95100 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2156-7554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General approaches of head and neck surgery involve varied procedures with developing perioperative care and a renewed effort on regional anaesthesia (RA) for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Due to the rich innervation and focus on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), RA techniques, particularly ultrasound-guided ones, are becoming popular as part of an opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic regimen. However, the evidence base is heterogeneous and synthesised clinical guidance is needed. This narrative review, performed according to the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) framework, summarises the existing literature on the role of RA in head and neck surgery, including anatomical basis, types of techniques used for RA, clinical applications, immediate outcomes and implementation. We conducted a comprehensive literature search, including studies published between January 2000 and October 2025 in English, across the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Understanding of the anatomy of cervical plexus (C1-C4) and cranial nerves such as trigeminal V is basic to delineation of techniques into superficial (e.g., SCPB), deep and selective cranial nerve blocks. The evidence about decreases in postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption (especially 24 h post-op) and decreased length of stay, largely through studies on thyroidectomy, has been consistent for SCPB as an adjunct to general anaesthesia. Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia (UGRA) has significantly enhanced precision and safety, reducing risks such as phrenic nerve paresis, although the concern for even higher complication rates remains with deeper or bilateral blocks. Although beneficial outcomes have been demonstrated, the literature is plagued by small and heterogeneous trials, variable block protocols, and a lack of data in complex oncologic resections or reconstructive settings. For successful implementation, there is a need for structured training programmes of anaesthesiologists and surgeons involved in the procedure performing UGRA together, institutional protocols on standardised technique, patient monitoring and outcomes auditing. RA is a useful and safe adjunct to head and neck surgery, providing analgesia in the short term and contributing to improved recovery during the perioperative period. Further studies should be conducted through large-scale, standardised trials to resolve the contributions of blocks in complex surgical cases and implement best practices for both training and clinical integration.

Indexed as

analgesiacervical plexus blockERAShead and neck surgeryopioid-sparingregional anaesthesiaultrasound-guided

Identifiers

PMID42194532
PMCPMC13207620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.