ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
GF-Predictability for Dental Implants (GF-PreDImp): A Multidomain Predictive Model for Dental Implant Success-Development, Structure and Clinical Application (Project Report).
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental implant therapy demonstrates high long-term survival; however, biological, behavioral, and technical complications remain prevalent. The objective of this project report was to introduce GF-Predictability for Dental Implants (GF-PreDImp), a novel, comprehensive pre-surgical multidimensional scoring proposal designed to quantify implant success predictability through a structured, evidence-based system. The model integrates six domains, Biological, Behavioral, Hard tissue, Soft tissue, Implant, and Prosthetic, assessing variables into a 100-point composite index. The domains evaluate systemic conditions (20 pts), behavioral habits (20 pts), hard-tissue anatomy (20 pts), soft-tissue characteristics (15 pts), implant parameters (15 pts), and prosthetic/surgical factors (10 pts). The final GF-PreDImp score categorizes predictability into five levels: excellent (≥85), good (70-84), moderate to guarded (55-69), guarded to high risk (40-54), and poor (<40). The tool generates dynamic visual outputs, including radar charts, enabling rapid clinical interpretation. While GF-PreDImp provides a framework for individualized risk stratification, it currently serves as a design proposal. Its implementation can improve clinical decision-making and enhance long-term implant outcomes. Further clinical assessments must be done to confirm the findings in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.