Continuous Non-Invasive Assessment of Segmental Cervical Motion: A Narrative Review and Validation Framework.

Neck pain is increasingly associated with exposure-dependent dysfunction linked to digitally mediated behaviors, prolonged near-work, sustained postures, and reduced movement variability, whereas cervical assessment remains dominated by static imaging and brief in-clinic examination. This narrative review evaluates why current diagnostic approaches remain poorly suited to the dynamic nature of many contemporary cervical disorders and examines segmental cervical motion as a clinically relevant but insufficiently observed functional target. Evidence from static imaging, dynamic radiographic methods, laboratory motion analysis, wearable inertial sensing, markerless video, and digital measure validation frameworks is synthesized to assess both current capabilities and translational limitations. Dynamic radiographic methods can characterize intervertebral motion with high anatomical specificity, but they are not suitable for scalable longitudinal monitoring. By contrast, wearable and video-based approaches are more compatible with real-world assessment, yet they capture external head-neck kinematics rather than vertebral-level kinematics directly and remain constrained by indirect observability, soft-tissue artifact, and inference uncertainty. On this basis, the review proposes a four-layer framework for continuous non-invasive cervical functional assessment based on sensing, representation, inference, and clinical interpretation, in which segmental cervical behavior is treated as a latent segment-informed functional construct inferred from multimodal external signals and periodically anchored to sparse reference-grade imaging anchors. Segmental motion signatures are consequently positioned as candidate digital measures for longitudinal cervical monitoring, provided that their development is supported by rigorous analytical and clinical validation, explicit uncertainty reporting, and demonstrated incremental clinical value.