Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42194329›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Development of an Integrated Radiotherapy Simulation Platform with AI-Driven Segmentation and Ray-Casting-Based Dosimetric Evaluation.

Cheng-Yen Lee, Hsiao-Ju Fu, Pin-Yi Chiang, Hien Vu-Dinh, Hung-Ching Chang, Hong-Tzong Yau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cheng-Yen LeeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 621301, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4535-2213
Hsiao-Ju FuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 621301, Taiwan.
Pin-Yi ChiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi 600566, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0001-6432-0017
Hien Vu-DinhDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 621301, Taiwan.
Hung-Ching ChangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 621301, Taiwan.
Hong-Tzong YauDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 621301, Taiwan.

Funding

Chia-Yi Christian Hospital No. R111-01-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiotherapy simulation is essential for accurately targeting tumors while preserving healthy tissue, ensuring treatment precision and safety. This study aimed to develop an integrated radiotherapy simulation system capable of automated segmentation, dose estimation, and collision detection within a virtual planning environment to enhance efficiency and reduce costs in radiotherapy treatment planning. The Point Transformer model was applied to organ point cloud data derived from CT medical imaging for automated segmentation. Farthest point sampling (FPS) was employed to downsample the data before training. To enhance the accuracy and anatomical fidelity of the AI-generated segmentation results, reconstruction and refinement algorithms, including k-d tree, outlier removal, marching cubes, and surface smoothing, were implemented. Beam penetration simulation with the ray casting algorithm was employed for correction-based dose estimation. A collision detection module was incorporated to identify potential machine-machine or machine-patient interactions. The entire workflow was executed within a Unity 3D-based virtual simulation environment. As a result, the Point Transformer model demonstrated high segmentation accuracy, achieving Dice scores of 93.86 ± 1.50% for single-organ and 91.86 ± 3.25% for multi-organ cases, surpassing the performance of PointNet++. Applying ray casting for the refined surface meshes generated through post-processing enabled accurate dose estimation with discrepancies of 3.5% (brain), 5.9% (liver), and 13.8% (lung) compared to a Pinnacle TPS. The proposed method provides a low-cost and adaptable solution that enables easy modification and further development, making it particularly suitable for widespread applications in radiotherapy research, education, and clinical workflow optimization.

Indexed as

Percentage Depth Dose (PDD)point transformerradiation treatment planningvirtual radiotherapy simulation

Identifiers

PMID42194329
PMCPMC13203389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.