Nano-Based 3D Printed Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Xiaoting Shi, Keda Liu, Weiqi Li, Ruobing Zhao, Wei Wang

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaoting ShiLiaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.

Keda LiuLiaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.

Weiqi LiLiaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.

Ruobing ZhaoLiaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.

Wei WangLiaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2798-0400

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271037Shenyang Science and Technology Project 23-408-3-04

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D bioprinting technology has made great strides in the field of bone tissue engineering. It has been able to create personalized biological structures on a macroscopic scale. In terms of microstructure bionics, 3D printing technology has also made some progress in recent years. The use of nanotechnology and drug delivery technology has provided a microenvironment that is more compatible with cell growth. Finally, it is possible to bridge the gap between engineered organizational structures and natural tissues. In this work, we summarize the widely used 3D bioprinting methods and the preparation of bioinks. Next, the classification of bone tissue engineering scaffold materials and nanomaterials for loading is briefly introduced. Then the technical shortcomings of current nanotechnology-based 3D bioprinting are described, along with the corresponding improvements. Finally, we summarize the prospects of nano-based 3D bioprinting technology in bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

3D printingbone defectnanotissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID42194326

DOI10.3390/bioengineering13050569

PMCPMC13203539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.