ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Explainable Neutrosophic Knowledge Distillation Model for Ocular Disease Classification Using Ultra-Wide Field Fundus Images.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultra-wide field (UWF) fundus image classification is an important part of the entire process of medical screening and decision support. However, the discrimination of various retinal disease classes is difficult due to the similarity between classes, class imbalance, and the indeterminacy of visual patterns. In our research, an explainable neutrosophic knowledge distillation (NKD) model for UWF fundus image classification is proposed. In the proposed model, the teacher model is a ResNet50 architecture that provides the student model with supervisory information that is aware of the indeterminacy of predictions. The proposed model combines the CLAHE-based preprocessing method with the neutrosophic distillation method to enable the student model to learn from the hard labels as well as the teacher model. The experimental results were evaluated using the 5-fold cross-validation method with an additional hold-out evaluation. The experimental results show that the proposed NKD model has a mean accuracy of 84.00%, specificity of 97.33%, precision of 84.99%, recall of 84.00%, and F1-score of 84.02%. The proposed model also has an accuracy of 87.86% with specificity of 97.48% and AUC of 97.48% in the ablation-based full model evaluation. It outperformed classical machine learning baselines based on Local Binary Patterns (LBP), Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG), and LBP + HOG features with Support Vector Machines (SVM) classifiers, as well as the baseline student, fuzzy student, and teacher Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models. For improved interpretability, the Grad-CAM++ technique was used to analyze the proposed NKD model. This analysis showed that the network attended to relevant retinal regions during classification. These results suggest that the proposed model can be an effective tool for UWF fundus image classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.