Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42194312›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Medical Image Segmentation Methods: A Decision-Guided Survey Covering 2D/3D CNNs, Transformers, VLMs, SAM-Based Models and Diffusion Approaches.

Kadir Sabanci, Busra Aslan, Muhammet Fatih Aslan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kadir SabanciDepartment of Electrical-Electronic Engineering, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Karaman 70100, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0238-9606
Busra AslanDepartment of Electronics and Automation, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Konya Technical University, Konya 42000, Türkiye.
Muhammet Fatih AslanDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Konya Technical University, Konya 42000, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7549-0137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in medical image segmentation have introduced a wide spectrum of deep learning paradigms, including 2D/3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs), transformer-based architectures, vision-language models (VLMs), prompt-driven foundation models such as Segment Anything Model (SAM), and diffusion-based approaches. Although these methods have demonstrated remarkable performance across MRI, CT, PET, ultrasound, and endoscopic imaging, the rapid proliferation of architectures has created methodological uncertainty regarding optimal model selection under varying clinical and data constraints. Existing surveys primarily focus on architectural categorization, yet provide limited guidance for decision-oriented model selection. This study presents a comprehensive and decision-guided survey that systematically analyzes segmentation paradigms across imaging modalities, task types, dataset characteristics, and evaluation protocols. Beyond taxonomy, we propose a practical model selection framework that links clinical scenarios, such as small lesion detection, multi-organ 3D segmentation, limited-data regimes, and domain shift, to appropriate segmentation strategies. Furthermore, robustness, generalization, annotation variability, and benchmarking reproducibility are critically examined. By integrating architectural taxonomy, cross-modal comparative analysis, and a structured decision framework, this work provides a clinically oriented roadmap for selecting segmentation methods and highlights future research directions toward reliable and reproducible medical AI systems.

Indexed as

diffusion modelsdomain shiftmedical image segmentationmodel selectionSegment Anything Model (SAM)vision-language models

Identifiers

PMID42194312
PMCPMC13203180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.