ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Explainable Split-Learning-Based Framework for Accurate Pulmonary Nodule Classification.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer rates are the highest among cancers, making it the leading cause of death worldwide. With advances in new technologies and diverse diagnostic methods, Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems (CADx) have improved pulmonary nodule classification with notable accuracy and speed. However, limited data availability and privacy concerns remain significant challenges, in addition to the reported rates of false negatives and false positives. This work aims to develop an approach based on collaborative feature extraction between multiple centers, thus achieving data efficiency and diversity while ensuring privacy and reducing false positives and false negatives. This work proposes a new explainable feature-based split learning approach using diverse Computed Tomography (CT) scan datasets to evaluate data diversity and privacy. It adopts a split ResNet-50 architecture on the client side for feature extraction. On the server side, a hybrid 2D-CNN combined with an attention mechanism is used for final classification and decision-making. The architecture was evaluated using two ablation studies based on ConvNeXt-Tiny and EfficientNetB0. In addition, the model was tested on two external datasets to assess its robustness and generalizability, and with Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIMEs) and Grad-CAM to assess trustworthiness. This proposed approach showed an accuracy and F1-score of 99.38%, with a 1.23% false negative rate and zero false positives. Moreover, when tested on totally unseen datasets, the approach achieved an accuracy and an F1-score of 99.28% on the first dataset, with 1.24% false negatives and 0% false positives. In addition, when tested on the second dataset, the results indicate an ability to generalize, with 95.74% accuracy, with false negative and false positive rates of 7.07% and 1.41%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.