ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Medical Imaging: A Survey of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unsupervised anomaly detection in medical imaging aims to automatically identify potential lesions that deviate from normal patterns in multimodal medical images without requiring annotations of abnormal samples, and is of great clinical value for early disease screening, unknown anomaly discovery, and label-scarce or open-set detection scenarios. Compared with industrial anomaly detection, medical images are characterized by complex anatomical structures, high semantic complexity of abnormalities, substantial inter-individual variability, and high annotation costs, which make the modeling and evaluation of related methods more challenging. This review systematically surveys unsupervised anomaly detection methods for medical imaging. By integrating task definitions, technological evolution, and clinical application needs, we comprehensively analyze 149 representative studies and 16 commonly used datasets collected from major academic databases. First, according to their core modeling paradigms, existing mainstream methods are categorized into four groups: image reconstruction-based methods, feature embedding-based methods, self-supervised learning-based methods, and foundation model-based methods. The technical characteristics, applicable scenarios, and inherent limitations of each category are then systematically discussed. Furthermore, from the perspectives of medical image structural properties and clinical application requirements, we summarize the key challenges currently faced by medical image unsupervised anomaly detection, including abnormal semantic modeling, the reliability of anomaly quantification, cross-center generalization capability, and evaluation protocols. Finally, future research directions, such as multi-task modeling, medical prior-guided learning, and multimodal fusion, are discussed in depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.