ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Advanced Biomaterials for Restorative Dentistry: From Biocompatibility to Bioactive and Smart Materials.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: The development of advanced dental biomaterials has significantly improved restorative dentistry, shifting the focus from purely mechanical restoration toward materials capable of interacting biologically with oral tissues. Modern restorative materials are expected to demonstrate high biocompatibility, adequate mechanical properties, and potential bioactivity that may support tissue preservation and long-term clinical performance. This review aims to analyze recent advances in next-generation dental restorative materials and to evaluate their biological compatibility and potential clinical relevance. (2) Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using major scientific databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on studies addressing advanced polymer-based composites, bioactive restorative materials, dental ceramics, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorative systems, and nanostructured biomaterials used in restorative dentistry. Relevant studies published in recent years were analyzed with respect to material composition, biological response, and reported clinical performance. (3) Results: The reviewed literature indicates that modern dental biomaterials, including nanocomposites, bioactive glass-containing materials, calcium silicate-based systems, and hybrid ceramic materials, show improved mechanical stability, enhanced remineralization potential, and reduced bacterial adhesion compared with traditional restorative materials. Advances in nanotechnology and material engineering have also contributed to the development of antimicrobial and bioactive restorative systems. (4) Conclusions: Next-generation dental restorative materials demonstrate promising characteristics that may improve clinical outcomes and biological integration in restorative dentistry; however, further long-term clinical investigations are required to fully confirm their safety, durability, and long-term effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.