ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An Improved SEM Preparation Workflow for Plasma Membrane Imaging in HepG2 and IM-9 Cells.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate visualization of the plasma membrane is essential for assessing morphological changes induced by experimental perturbations. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) enables high-resolution imaging of cell surface architecture, but the fixation, dehydration, and drying steps critically affect membrane preservation. Here, we present an improved SEM preparation workflow for two cultured cell models with different growth phenotypes, HepG2 and IM-9, and evaluate the effects of fixation time and drying strategy on plasma membrane preservation. Among the tested conditions, a shorter glutaraldehyde fixation time (15 min) combined with stepwise ethanol-to-HMDS substitution provided the best overall preservation of membrane continuity, cell shape, and surface regularity. Morphometric analysis supported the qualitative SEM observations, and HMDS-processed samples also showed better structural stability during storage under the tested conditions. This workflow provides a simple, reproducible, and cost-effective strategy for SEM-based analysis of cell surface morphology in cultured cell models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.