Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42194251›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Automatic Personal Identification Using a Single MRI Slice.

Andreas Heinrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andreas HeinrichDepartment of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3862-4543

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 514572362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of unknown individuals is challenging, and radiological imaging databases provide rich anatomical information for automated recognition. This study evaluated whether a single routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slice contains sufficient person-specific features to identify individuals in large databases. It analyzed 11,078 head MRI examinations from 5770 individuals (age 52 ± 18 years, 2714 men) acquired between 2002 and 2025. For identification, 112 individuals were randomly selected across eight 10-year age groups, and one slice from four anatomical regions was extracted. The remaining 10,966 MRI examinations with 247,804 slices formed the reference database. Distinctive anatomical features were automatically extracted using computer vision (CV), and the identification rate was evaluated by rank. Using a single MRI slice, the identification rate at rank 1 reached 96% (107/112) for the best-performing region, the maxillary sinus, among 5770 potential identities. Across all regions, the rank 1 identification rate ranged from 91% to 96%; combining them increased rank 1 and 10 identification rates to 98% (110/112) and 99% (111/112). Identification rate remained stable over several years, with only two cases showing reduced rank 1 performance, likely due to age-related morphological changes. A single MRI slice contains stable, individualized features sufficient for reliable identification in large databases, supporting automated CV-based personal identification across years.

Indexed as

computer vision systemsheadhuman identificationmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID42194251
PMCPMC13203090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.