ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Automatic Personal Identification Using a Single MRI Slice.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-based organ weight estimation from postmortem computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of unknown individuals is challenging, and radiological imaging databases provide rich anatomical information for automated recognition. This study evaluated whether a single routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slice contains sufficient person-specific features to identify individuals in large databases. It analyzed 11,078 head MRI examinations from 5770 individuals (age 52 ± 18 years, 2714 men) acquired between 2002 and 2025. For identification, 112 individuals were randomly selected across eight 10-year age groups, and one slice from four anatomical regions was extracted. The remaining 10,966 MRI examinations with 247,804 slices formed the reference database. Distinctive anatomical features were automatically extracted using computer vision (CV), and the identification rate was evaluated by rank. Using a single MRI slice, the identification rate at rank 1 reached 96% (107/112) for the best-performing region, the maxillary sinus, among 5770 potential identities. Across all regions, the rank 1 identification rate ranged from 91% to 96%; combining them increased rank 1 and 10 identification rates to 98% (110/112) and 99% (111/112). Identification rate remained stable over several years, with only two cases showing reduced rank 1 performance, likely due to age-related morphological changes. A single MRI slice contains stable, individualized features sufficient for reliable identification in large databases, supporting automated CV-based personal identification across years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.