Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42194170›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Early Motor Interventions in Infants and Young Children: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.

Sophia Charitou, Emmanouil Skordilis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophia CharitouSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 17237 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8670-5762
Emmanouil SkordilisSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 17237 Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly motor milestones play a critical role in shaping developmental trajectories across motor, cognitive, social, and functional domains. Increasing evidence indicates that motor competence facilitates environmental exploration, learning opportunities, and social engagement during infancy and early childhood.

methodsThe present scoping review aimed to map and synthesize the existing evidence on early motor interventions in children aged 0-6 years across diverse pediatric populations. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, and data were extracted and synthesized using a descriptive and thematic approach.

resultsA total of 30 studies were included, encompassing a wide range of populations, including preterm infants, children at risk of cerebral palsy, and typically developing children. Across studies, early motor interventions were associated with improvements in motor outcomes and, in many cases, broader developmental domains such as cognition and social interaction. Intervention effectiveness appeared to be influenced by factors such as timing, intensity, task specificity, and caregiver involvement.

conclusionsThe review provides a cross-population synthesis of early motor interventions and proposes a conceptual framework that integrates shared mechanisms underlying effective intervention across diverse pediatric groups. This approach offers a more unified understanding of how early motor interventions influence developmental trajectories beyond diagnosis-specific perspectives.

Indexed as

cerebral palsydevelopmental delayearly childhoodearly motor interventioninfancymotor developmentneurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID42194170
PMCPMC13204060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.