ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Early Motor Interventions in Infants and Young Children: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly motor milestones play a critical role in shaping developmental trajectories across motor, cognitive, social, and functional domains. Increasing evidence indicates that motor competence facilitates environmental exploration, learning opportunities, and social engagement during infancy and early childhood.
methodsThe present scoping review aimed to map and synthesize the existing evidence on early motor interventions in children aged 0-6 years across diverse pediatric populations. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, and data were extracted and synthesized using a descriptive and thematic approach.
resultsA total of 30 studies were included, encompassing a wide range of populations, including preterm infants, children at risk of cerebral palsy, and typically developing children. Across studies, early motor interventions were associated with improvements in motor outcomes and, in many cases, broader developmental domains such as cognition and social interaction. Intervention effectiveness appeared to be influenced by factors such as timing, intensity, task specificity, and caregiver involvement.
conclusionsThe review provides a cross-population synthesis of early motor interventions and proposes a conceptual framework that integrates shared mechanisms underlying effective intervention across diverse pediatric groups. This approach offers a more unified understanding of how early motor interventions influence developmental trajectories beyond diagnosis-specific perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.