ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Pain Assessment and Management in Pediatric Trauma Patients Transported to an Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate how often pain is assessed and treated in pediatric trauma patients transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to a pediatric emergency department (ED), and to compare current practice with national recommendations of the Polish Ministry of Health for prehospital pediatric pain management.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of EMS and ED documentation for all trauma patients under 18 years of age transported to the Pediatric Teaching Hospital of the University Clinical Center of the Medical University of Warsaw between 1 January and 31 December 2021. A total of 981 patients with injury or suspected injury or burns were included without exclusion criteria. For patients with documented pain scores, we analyzed pain intensity (0-10), the scales used [Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (FACES)], body region injured, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, suspected alcohol or psychoactive substance use, and type and route of analgesic administration. We further evaluated non-pharmacological interventions, pain reassessment, and achievement of at least 50% pain reduction, as defined in national guidelines. Statistical analysis included Student's
resultsPain was assessed in 839/981 (85.5%) patients; 651/839 (77.6%) reported pain, most frequently of moderate intensity. Despite this, only 208/981 (21.2%) patients received analgesics prehospitally. Morphine and paracetamol were the most frequently used drugs, predominantly administered intravenously, while non-opioid monotherapy was commonly used in patients with lower baseline pain scores. Less than half of all patients received any non-pharmacological intervention whatsoever. Pain was reassessed in 734/839 (87.5%) patients, with a mean reassessment time of approximately 10 min; however, in many cases reassessment occurred earlier than the expected onset of analgesic action. Overall, only 29.4% of patients with pain and documented reassessment achieved the recommended ≥50% reduction in pain intensity, and at least 70.2% of the cohort had no documented evidence of treatment fully complying with national recommendations.
conclusionsIn this real-world prehospital and ED cohort, pediatric trauma pain remains under-treated, and adherence to national guidelines on opioid-based analgesia and pain reassessment is suboptimal. Further efforts are needed to improve documentation, expand the recommended pharmacological options for mild pain, and strengthen education on guideline-concordant pediatric pain management in EMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.