ArticleCells2026
Cryopreserved Mucosal Olfactory Ensheathing Cells Promote Functional Recovery After Dorsal Root Injury.
Article in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Olfactory ensheathing cell (OEC) transplantation has been widely shown to support axonal regeneration, remyelination, and functional recovery after central nervous system injury; however, autologous approaches are limited by low cell yields from patient biopsies, which may be insufficient for large spinal cord lesions. This study evaluated whether cryopreservation could provide a scalable alternative by preserving the therapeutic potential of mucosa-derived OECs. Using a rat dorsal root injury model, cryopreserved mucosa-derived OECs (CmOECs) were thawed and assessed for viability, phenotype, and efficacy following transplantation. Although total viable cell yield was reduced compared with primary cultures, the relative proportion of OECs remained stable, and cells retained characteristic morphology and marker expression in vitro. In vivo, transplantation of CmOECs resulted in significant functional recovery in climbing and forepaw fault tasks compared with injured controls, with outcomes comparable to primary mucosal OEC transplantation. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the survival and integration of transplanted cells at the dorsal root entry zone, alongside evidence of axonal regeneration and astrocytic remodeling. These findings demonstrate that mucosa-derived OECs retain therapeutic efficacy following cryopreservation and support the development of standardized OEC biobanks as a scalable strategy for spinal cord repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.